Minister Gelmini , whose merits are dubious school (graduated in law, went to 1000 km from home to take an easier exam as a lawyer and has never accepted the invitation of Bersani to show their votes), wants introduce meritocracy in the school. How? With complex assessments of work and a cash award to deserving teachers. A fourteenth month.
That seems so good, but doubts and problems are many.
How to decide if it's a good philosophy teacher or a math? And 'the best teacher or professor severe generous (in votes)? It 's more a good professor who closely follows the program or what comes out of the sow but inspires students? And how to evaluate the clarity in the exposition of an argument? E 'credible that a president vows to give his teachers or professors that they are deemed? When
then some were awarded, how would their relationship with other teachers ? Those who are not rewarded and may resent someone could change its behavior, worsening the quality of service in order to get the prize. I doubt
assessment of the merits are therefore legitimate and only 35 schools out of over 1400 candidates in the trial have agreed to participate in the evaluation proposed by Gelmini (see here) . In addition, the
Gelmini Brunetta (another minister whose merits are dubious as demonstrated in this article) were able to propose an economic incentive but have not allocated a €. The money should come from the same schools, who already suffer from a chronic shortage of funds. And 'natural, therefore, that many say no to policies that have few certainties, except that of a little credit for those who propose certain methods of assessment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment