Cholesterol Test More Condition_symptoms

The synthetic gasoline tax asset


If the news (see here) is confirmed, we are faced with a revolution: an English company, Cell Energy, seems to have discovered a way to create a fuel derived from hydrogen and used with the engines now in production at affordable rates, around 30 cents per liter (1).

A source of energy at affordable prices without CO 2 , derived from hydrogen and can be used with current engines would be really something extraordinary.

First you change the geo-political balance in many areas of the world. The struggle for control of oil has caused wars and political compromises little ladies, but has also caused major economic impact: the money earned by oil producers have increased the instability foreign exchange and financial markets.

With an artificial derived from hydrogen gas, the Europeans and the Americans will import less than what happens in Iraq , Iran or Venezuela and weigh less choices China, which now is a great consumer of oil. No more worry about, also the oil reserves or the price. We will also leave in the ground or will be used only in poor countries who can not or will not acquire the technology to produce synthetic gasoline, or the countries currently produce oil.

Then they will probably wiped out many projects, sometimes illusory, to change the world of transportation.

Years ago it seemed certain the changeover to hydrogen. In a book of great success, the futurist Jeremy Rifkin has suggested major changes in the economy through the introduction of engines driven by hydrogen, which could replace conventional engines.

but it turned out, at least so far, illusion. The high cost of hydrogen and the difficulties of creating a distribution network in security conditions have made the road impassable hydrogen. So

is back in fashion 's electric car, which can now enjoy a better technology. There remain some problems: electric cars are expensive, they have little autonomy and there is no mains supply. Use is limited and therefore models sold do not meet the favor of potential buyers.

In Italy they sell less than 200 electric cars a year, about 1 in 10,000 cars. Practically nothing.

The only way to go to transport "electric" and focusing on railways, building new lines, most modern and fast.

But what happens if you fail to produce a synthetic fuel that does not generate CO 2 and is not derived from petroleum? will be still convenient point on the power or the railways? Serve new railways and new roads used by trucks powered by traditional with non-fossil fuels?



--- (1) The article talks about $ 1.50 a gallon: In view of the euro / dollar and a gallon equals 3.79 liters, the rate is about 30 cents per liter

Morrowind Patch V1.6.1820

meanwhile that the government lucubrate fantasies about federalism someone tries to evoke the threat of a charge sheet.

But what is a charge sheet ?

To answer must take a step back and understand what is taxed in the Italian system.
In Italy the greatest tax, ie VAT, IRE, IRES and IRAP, flow rate of Income, value added or production capacity.
Simply put, if I had to 01.01.2010 100, then this year I produced 50, will be taxed only in the production of income of 50, (say 25 ...) so that at the end of the year I have 100 + 25 = 125.
I then taxed a flow, not the heritage.
The same thing will happen in 2011 with the new stream of income. You can do an example with the money in the bank: interest income are taxed (27%), but not the money to the account generating such interest.

If I decide to introduce a tax assets the government will tax the assets. So, for example, if the 01/01/2010 avevo un conto in banca di 100.000 Euro, oppure, per generalizzare, dei beni mobili o immobili pari a tale cifra, verrà tassato il patrimonio.
E gli interessi una volta introdotta tale tassa?
Probabilmente, visto che il fine è racimolare soldi, nulla cambierà.
Quindi alla fine verranno tassati gli interessi e il patrimonio.

Ricordo che nel nostro ordinamento esistono già tasse patrimoniali: l’ ICI è una patrimoniale sulla casa. L’ IMU sulle seconde case sarà una patrimoniale.

Ma quali saranno gli effetti di un’introduzione di una patrimoniale?

Le tasse patrimoniali, per loro natura, si prestano molto bene a real estate tax, as impossible to move, and land or houses, causing still discursive effects on rents and inflation: in fact, rents will rise much higher the capital, turning at the end of inflation in the net. Speech

different when you try to tax the goods. Just passing to meet the formidable difficulties .
not difficult to tax accounts, perhaps with a tax on the storage media. Unpopular, but possible.
Technically it is possible to tax all investments made in Italy, it is sufficient to impose the financial intermediary to act as withholding agent. But financial investments by the pension fund is meant to BOT to receiver. If you introduce a
Capital Securities who would buy them again? Who would buy government bonds, knowing that would be burdened by a property? So the state should offer higher rates to sell them, they must pay higher interest rates, interest than offsetting the revenue from the capital. Except in the case of securities purchased abroad. But as we know more than half of Italian securities are owned by the Italians themselves.
effects there would be worse on every type of investment: no one would invest more in Italy, wishing to invest will also be addressed to foreign investors. Then
there are assets consist of shares. If I own 20% of Fiat, I do not have unlimited cash, but my participation is worth a lot. Yes, but how much?
How much is a share of society? If the quoted value should it (the conditional is a must ...) to the market, for the others, which are 99.99% of the total who evaluates? Remember that you can do a limited company with capital of € 10,000 bill that even 100 million a year. And the value of that company is NOT the capital, but need a special skill that sets the value, on average every 3 months.
Finally we come to any other movable property: things. Yes, because if I own a Van Gogh , I have no money liquid, but if I sell it but I'll have plenty of them. And if I have the same jewelry, luxury cars, precious metals. Think of the case if I buy a ton of copper! E 'assets.

If I have a mix of all things above, then it becomes evident the difficulty in determining the final value and why it has always waived, with the exception of property, to tax wealth. Moreover, the richest instantly transferred their assets abroad or take up residence abroad, and then the tax would be so difficult and unpopular to make it impractical to apply. Here at

"La Stampa are well stigmatized some problems and some proposals. Other interesting comments here .